Summary: ‘Do your homework’ – Coinbase shuts down claims of Trump-era favoritism

Published: 1 month and 27 days ago
Based on article from AMBCrypto

Tensions between Washington and the burgeoning crypto industry have flared anew, as U.S. Senator Chris Murphy publicly accused leading exchange Coinbase of receiving undue political favors during the Trump administration. These allegations have ignited a sharp response from Coinbase and its supporters, who decry the senator's claims as ill-informed and politically motivated, pointing instead to a pattern of inconsistent regulatory behavior by government agencies.

Senator Murphy's Allegations

Senator Chris Murphy took to X (formerly Twitter) to claim that Coinbase benefited from a quid pro quo arrangement, alleging the company received regulatory favors from the Trump administration in exchange for political support and financial contributions. Specifically, Murphy cited Coinbase's backing of pro-Donald Trump allies, its contribution to Trump's inauguration, and the SEC's decision to drop a lawsuit against the exchange as evidence of political favoritism. He also implicated Coinbase in funding a new ballroom project on the National Mall, suggesting this was another avenue for influence.

Coinbase's Robust Rebuttal

Coinbase's Chief Legal Officer, Paul Grewal, and Chief Policy Officer, Faryar Shirzad, swiftly dismissed Murphy's accusations. Grewal argued that the true issue lay in years of "regulatory hostility" and "arbitrary treatment" by the SEC. Shirzad provided a detailed, point-by-point rebuttal: clarifying that Fairshake, the PAC in question, is non-partisan and supports candidates from both parties; emphasizing that corporate donations to presidential inaugural committees are a long-standing tradition across administrations; and explaining that the National Mall donation was made through a nonprofit supporting the U.S. Park Service, with many companies contributing and Coinbase having no role in construction. Shirzad further highlighted past court rulings that labeled the SEC's actions against Coinbase as "arbitrary and capricious," suggesting the controversy stems from a deeper ideological divide over crypto's place in the financial system. Attorney John E. Deaton also weighed in, questioning the SEC's inconsistent stance of initially approving Coinbase's public listing only to later target parts of its business model. He accused both Senator Murphy and SEC Chair Gensler of prioritizing political agendas over American innovation.

Cookies Policy - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - © 2025 Altfins, j. s. a.