Summary: Does Bitcoin Power Law model still work in 2025 after S2F failed?

Published: 1 month and 26 days ago
Based on article from CryptoSlate

The landscape of Bitcoin price analysis is evolving, with the power-law model emerging as a compelling framework for understanding its long-term trajectory. Unlike previous approaches that often offered fixed targets, this model provides a dynamic, time-based channel, helping investors and analysts gauge Bitcoin's position within its cyclical journey amidst new market influences like Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs).

Unpacking the Power-Law Framework

The power-law model conceives Bitcoin's price movement as a time-based compounding curve, functioning more as a "location map" than a precise point forecast. It is constructed by applying a linear regression to the logarithm of Bitcoin's price against the logarithm of time since its genesis. This process defines a central "fair-value" curve, flanked by parallel lines representing historical support and resistance levels. The core logic posits that Bitcoin adoption follows a power function of time, with volatility naturally decaying as the network matures, leading to tightening oscillations around the regression line over successive cycles. Currently, Bitcoin is observed to be trading approximately 20% below its fair-value regression, yet well above the model's support floor.

ETF Dynamics and Price Trajectory

The advent of Bitcoin ETFs has introduced a powerful new variable into the market, acting as a significant "demand valve" that influences Bitcoin's placement within the power-law channel. Recent record-breaking ETF inflows have demonstrably pushed prices, while subsequent outflows illustrate the two-way nature of this new macro lever. These transitory demand surges or contractions can temporarily push Bitcoin towards the channel's upper or lower rails. Looking ahead, sustained ETF inflows combined with favorable macroeconomic conditions could propel the price toward the upper resistance band (currently near $491,800). Conversely, persistent outflows or adverse macro shifts might drive a retest of the lower support rail (around $48,300), a level historically associated with capitulation events. A base-case scenario envisions price continuing to oscillate around the fair-value regression, with dampened amplitude if volatility decay persists.

Beyond Stock-to-Flow: A Robust Alternative

The increasing adoption of the power-law model comes amid the acknowledged limitations of the once-popular Stock-to-Flow (S2F) model. S2F faced criticism for its failure to meet specific price targets, methodological issues such as overfitting, and its neglect of crucial demand and liquidity variables. In contrast, the power-law approach offers a robust, monotonically rising framework that captures historical cycle extremes without claiming to predict the exact date or magnitude of future price surges. While it doesn't mechanistically incorporate real-time drivers like ETF demand or liquidity cycles, its elegance lies in providing clear, directional guardrails. Practitioners therefore complement the power-law channel analysis with continuous monitoring of these external factors to understand Bitcoin's near-term positioning.

Cookies Policy - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - © 2025 Altfins, j. s. a.