Summary: ESMA proposes ending EU custody and transfer services for non-compliant stablecoins

Published: 19 days and 21 hours ago
Based on article from CryptoSlate

The New Frontier of Stablecoin Regulation in Europe

The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) is pushing for a significant expansion of the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation, shifting its focus from trading restrictions to a total service ban for non-compliant stablecoins. This proposal aims to prohibit licensed providers from offering custody or transfer services for tokens that fail to meet EU standards. If adopted, the move would fundamentally change the landscape for European digital asset holders, making it nearly impossible to store or move non-compliant assets through regulated channels.

From Trading Bans to Total Service Restrictions

ESMA’s latest policy submission represents a hardening of its regulatory stance compared to earlier guidance. Previously, the regulator suggested that while trading non-compliant tokens should be restricted, investors could still retain custody of their holdings or transfer them to other platforms. The new proposal seeks to close this loophole by prohibiting any licensable crypto-asset service—including safekeeping and private key control—from interacting with non-compliant stablecoins. By removing the distinction between trading and custody, the regulator aims to eliminate regulatory arbitrage and give a clear competitive advantage to compliant token issuers within the European Economic Area.

Legal Conflicts and the Future of Asset Custody

One of the most complex aspects of this proposal is the lack of a clear "wind-down" mechanism for existing users. Current MiCA framework requires service providers to return client assets as soon as possible, yet a total ban on custody and transfers creates a legal paradox for providers trying to facilitate withdrawals. If the act of holding or moving a specific stablecoin becomes illegal for a licensed business, the industry will require clear legislative amendments to reconcile these prohibitions with the fundamental obligation to protect client property. While the proposal does not ban personal ownership in private wallets, it effectively severs non-compliant tokens from the regulated financial infrastructure, forcing a potential mass migration toward compliant alternatives.

Cookies Policy - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - © 2025 Altfins, j. s. a.